farage the hypocrit.

I agree with Nigel farage that Herman van rompuy is a non entity and im eurosceptic although not to the extent of UKIP, however farage is a hypocrit, he hates the EU apparently so much so, that he takes a 64,000 salary and 2 million in expenses- hypocritcal nigel?

if mossad was behind the operation, Israel cocked up

First things first, lets remember something which the liberal media mainly the guardian , independent and BBC seem to forget, namely that the Hamas operative killed in Dubai was not a nice man, innocent or a little guy in the operations of Hamas.Mahmoud al-Mabhouh had blood on his hands, he had killed 2 israeli soldiers in the past and was smuggling weapons from Iran into Gaza, he was to all intents and purposes a terrorist. It was also wrong of Sarkozy to call the killing of this terrorist cold blooded murder, murder happens to an innocent person and a hamas operative isn't innocent. I will therefore shed no tears for this guy being dead, it means millions of israelies can live easier at night with one more enemy out of the way, although i feel arresting him would have been a better choice.

However the operation in Dubai was a complete and utter farce, ill planned, ill thought out and sure to cause diplomatic outrage with countries such as Britain and Australia who have been loyal friends of Israel, whilst giving succour to Israel's enemy's everywhere.If this was done by Mossad Israel has a lot of explaining to do. 22 years ago israel promised to stop using British passports for operations, yet today, 12 innocent israelis who have dual citizenship with Britain had their passports stolen and pinched and doctored without their knowledge, or indeed even the British Government's knowledge. That is simply wrong and the UK is right to demand an apology and an explanation as well as an investigation if it was Israel. You simply dont do that to a trusted ally , or put Israeli lives in dangers by using their dual citizenship against them. Seriously if this was mossad 26 faked passports from germany, france, ireland, australia and the UK - was this really neeeded to kill one man -slightly over the top me thinks. Not only this now every israeli citizenship will be supected of being a double of agent, and mossad's freedom of manouvre will be decreased, and israel faces the threat of world isolation. At the UNGA; Israel just lost ten votes including - Gosh! - the UK, Ireland, and France, who voted AGAINST the Israeli line, and Germany and Australia, who both abstained. Israel's allies our dropping like nine pins.

then their is the operation itself, anyone with half a brain knows dubai is one of the most security concious countries everywhere, with nearly as many cctv cameras a wealthy businessman. Yet precautions to hide the spy's identies if it was mossad seemed incredibly lax, they might as well have waved to the camera and said im going to kill a hamas operative. Not so much cloak and daggers more like keystone cops.

then their was the response after the killing the increasingly belligerent, racist far right Avigdor Lieberman with a large case of foot and mouth and who is reprehrensibly Israel's foreign minister basically told all his allies smugly he couldn't care if the killing had broken diplomatic protocol and Israel's allies should just fall into line and praise israel, making an already tense situation even worse. When one of the most pro israel papers in the australian turns against israel and says never do this to us again, you know Israel's diplomacy at this important time is rubbish.

then their is the position of Binyamin Netanyahu. In his first time in office in 1998 their was the botched Khelaad Mashal operation and now this. Once is an accident, twice suggests a seriously lack of oversight by the prime minister. The mossad chief needs to be fired for his incompetence by Netanyahu or Netanyahu should do the honourable thing and resign for not controlling mossad. He apparently thinks a major diplomatic crisis wont happen, well i'm sitting and looking at it, as Israel one by one is losing their best allies under netanyahu due to the beligerency of this government's policy abroad first turkey and now Britain and Australia. Tsipi Livni all is forgiven!

i really hope this isn't mossad, the operation seems so botched for an intelligence service whos meant to be an envy of the world.

Treatment for Cancer patients at home

The title suggests that Gordon Brown in domestic Policy has finally come up with a great idea to help us out of the recession. Apparently every cancer patient will receive one to one care at their home if the Labour Party is elected for the next general election. It sounds like a good idea although like most labour election pledges it will probably only be short term and is an effect an attempt to buy voters off. Unfortunately we then need to remember the state of the public finances and suddenly it doesn't seem like good idea to increase public sector debt even further on an unfunded and unfeasible plan. In fact it looks downnright dangerous.

Then Unfortunately you remember we're 150 Billion in Debt and thats not including the £100 Billion public sector pension's timebomb, or the £50 Billion or so PFI debt which is not even on the books. With this in mind where is Gordon Brown going to get the cash for this policy to become viable. Is he seriously considering adding even further to the debt, when it is already the size of the US deficit which may i add has a lot more people and is much larger than the UK. Well it seems that he's pretty set on this policy so obviously so, which will lead to more taxes to the hard suffering taxpayer in the future. This is because according to most estimates this plan will cost at least £100 Million and where exactly with the level of debt are meant to magic this money from.

What gordon brown really needs to do is cut spending so we can finally get to the grips with the gigantic black hole in debt we are facing, but unfortunately Gordon Brown is like an addict to spending and no matter what you say to him like an alcoholic he just will not give the poison up.

The EU president: Value For Money? no way

its nice to know that a position which is pointless, that no one wanted, and is introduced as part of an unpopular treaty where the EU leaders at large showed their disdain for democracy is costing 300 million a year for taxpayers. Thats 50 Million a year more then the American President costs the USA taxpayer.

For 300 Million a year, you'd expect an all singing all dancing famous statesman as President for the EU, and who have the EU got Mr Herman Van Rompuy- well known to no one outside Belgium.

Prince Charles doesn't know what he's talking about

in recent comments leaked to the News of the World, Prince Charles has landed the blame for all the islamic unrest in the world to the israeli palestinian conflict. Not only this but apparently the reason their is no peace in the middle east is the israeli -palestinian conflict. He goes on from this blaming the american and british government's support for israel as the main source for the islamic unrest in the world, and the fuelling of islamic extremism.

This is an incredulous claim, and it's a load of rubbish
1. 9/11 - had nothing to do with the israeli palestinian conflict - it was carried about by islamic extremists who dont like the western liberal way of life
2. Their was unrest in the arab world even before israel existed - so israel did not create this
3. The arab states even when israel has existed have caused muslim unrest themselves -look for example of how syria killed 3,000 muslims in hamla, how the lebananese government treats palestinian refugees
4. What has calling for sharia law got to do with the israeli palestinian conflict - a key demand of islamic extremists.

5. Very often unrest in the islamic world is the arab governments disgraceful treatment of its citizens from saudi arabia to egypt.


Quite simply israel is used as a smokescreen by islamic extremists, they would still be there attacking the west if israel didn't exist. Sayed Qutb the father of modern islamic extremism created it as an ideology to attack the west and moderate islam - and yes part of this goal was focused on destroying israel but it was not the end goal. It was also not the source of islamic unrest in the world.

Oh and another thing, look at your mother charles, who does a great job as queen, because as is constitutionally allowed, she is meant to be completely neutral. From the environment, to medicine, to the economy , to foreign policy, you have hardly been neutral Prince Charles, so i advise you to stop damaging the monarchy and shut up - because a - your meant to be neutral and B - as shown here very often your opinions are ill informed.

A story the news wont tell you about.

According to the media in the UK, Israel is constantly collectively punishing the palestinians, whilst the rest of the world wails about this supposed injustice. Neither of these statements are true.

In Lebanon, you will be automatically put in a refugee camp if you are palestinian, you will not be allowed to leave this refugee camp, and you will not be able to get a profession or occupation. On top of this there unemployment is much higher, they face discrimination in all walks of life, and are not represented in the Lebanese parliament, mainly because they cannot vote. Compare this to Israel, where in the west bank Israel has helped in the past year through the removal of 100s of checkpoints, which has led to 7% growth in the west bank, they can go to the supreme court, where if they so wish they can complain about their treatment, there are elections they can vote in for the palestinian authority, and their water and electricity is provided. This is not to say the situation is perfect it is not, their is discrimation, but it is not on the same level as Lebanon, and constantly Israel is trying to improve the situation.

Often israel is compared to apartheid south africa, this is not true in any way shape or form, if you really want to see a situation where apartheid is practiced on the palestinians look no further then Lebanon.This is disgusting and out and out discrimination yet you do not hear the so called pro palestinian movement talking about this as they are too busy trying to deligitimise Israel, then look at the facts.

Apparently it was just the right who thought the PSBR report was awful according to Polly toynbee

the bastion of the left and guardian columnist and new labour luvvie Polly Toynbee blames the Right wing newspapers for their negative report on the PSBR(pre budget report). From my perspective i can see how any newspaper of any political persuasion would find it hard to defend a budget which will leave us in trilllions of pounds of debt, where political bribes are put ahead of necessary spending cuts as the treasury department v prime minister's office row showed, where everyone gets taxed to the hilt, and enterprise is discouraged. If Polly had bothered to check as Conservative home have helpfully shown -the guardian equally criticised the PSBR report.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2009/12/does-polly-toynbee-read-the-guardian.html

So universal agreement that this government's economic policy is a complete disaster. NOW when it gets to may lets kick this morally banrupt government out of power.

The disappointment for conservatives in Nicholas sarkozy

When Sarkozy became President of France in 2007, British Conservatives finally thoughy france had realised that gaullism with it's brand of statism and corruption didn't work. We hailed the french thatcher who would let the market rip, and turn france into a supporter of the UK and America. We saw him as principled and willing to defend capitalism, unfortunately as time and Conservative Home higlight, we've ended up with a man who has a french napoleon concept- who wants to destroy the city of london, end free market capitalism, is best friends with Gaddafi and wants a european superstate. He once and for all shows why conservatives need to stay principled and not retreat to the language of the left.

-Here's the conservative home article:
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/international/2009/12/the-ideological-confusion-of-nicolas-sarkozy.html

Ben Bradshaw's distasteful remarks

When the bbc rejected the gaza disaster appeal -due to their belief in political neutrality there was a hornets nest of disgust - saying the bbc was pro israel etc - this is the same organisation though who as i have showed on my blog is steadfastly pro israel.

I did not know then but do know now, that the culture secretary ben bradshaw says israel has a long reputation for bullying the BBC. this is a disgusting statement for a start israel is a democracy and therefore doesn't bully news organisations and it has a free independent media - and does not tell any media organisations what to say. Secondly the BBC has a history of being vehemently anti israel- as the hushed up balen report showed. Thirdly his calling of israel as a bully shows his own political bias.

A response to pierre Lellouche criticism of cameron's eurosceptic position.

Actually, Lellouche, what is pathetic is a government holding a referendum on the EU Constitution and then ignoring the "no" vote - not even bothering to hold a referendum a second time- like you made the irish do.

As France did.

In fact, not only pathetic, but downright fraudulent.

but then the french view of the EU never wanted to include democracy in it.

why the mail is wrong, cameron right, and like usual the situation we find ourselves in is all the fault of the Labour Party

the mail is not acting realistically. Unfortunately once the lisbontreaty is in law David Cameron can do no nothing about it, nor any conservative leader howevever eurosceptic they are. As far as i know after all no human can turn back time.

What is missing from the papers is that we shouldn't have got to this psotion in the first place, both the liberal democrats and labour party promised us a referendum on the Eu constitution which is substantially the same as the lisbon treaty -with the guarantees we negotiated being seen as quicksand - according to the house of commons foreign affairs select committee. If both lib dems and laboru had followed there manifesto promises and voted for a referendum in parliament the british people could have had there say- and the treaty may not have gone into law.

As it is, it has and cameron has no let matters lie -he is seeking to renogiate our relationship with europe on social, economic and asylum issues - which i fully support. He has also made it clear that pulling out is not an option-which once again i agree with as a eurorealist- i dont support a united states of europe however i support a european union of member states -and i believe if cameron battles on our behalf on the issues he has stated we can do this.

A Critique of Noam Chomsky - given before his satelite talk to leeds university Students-please read!

If you listen to the leeds university department and the students, Noam Chomsky is the best thing since sliced bread, he's a true hero, who sticks it to those nasty countries, the United States and Israel, he's the only one brave enough to talk the truth, he's jewish- so he cant apparently be accused of anti semitism, and because he's left wing he's cool. Well im here to break it to you, this is a bunch of hogwash. Noam Chomsky, is a holocaust denying, rabble rousing, far left, defender of terrorists, anti semites who like's writing forewords for anti semites. You see it's not just the far right you have to watch with anti semitism it's the far left.

Those who defend Chomsky on the supporting of holocaust denying charge say to things
1. He cant be a supporter of the deniers he's jewish
2. He's Defending freedom of speech.

The reply's to this- Just because he's nominally jewish, doesn't mean he cant hate jews. to the second question, im a great supporter of freedom speech, from nick griffin's appearance on question time, to the mohammed cartoons, to david irving being put in jail - i supported the freedom of speech position on all of this, but this is nothing to do with freedom of speech. it is not giving publicity to a holocaust denier and therefore supporting him - to give you an example i will defend nick griffin's right to freedom of speech on question time -however i will not then go out of my way to write a preface to a publication or book he writes, because that is tantamount and can be seen as support of his ideas. are you that naive, im all for freedom of speech that is not what a foreword to a book is - a foreword to a book is support to that writer.

Then theres chomsky's pure undiluted anti semitism which alone should mean he shouldn't be treated seriously, and seen by the public as a crackpot in the same box as people such as Nick Griffin, yet perversely he's seen as a respected academic - if this isn't an example of how we are not targeting the far left's anti semitism, what is. This came from Noam Chomsky's Mouth-here is use of anti semitic language and please dont tell me this guy has been misquoted etc - after all he is a linguistics professor -here's the passage -We might ask how the Times would react to an Arab claim that the Jews do not merit a 'second homeland' because they already have New York, with a huge Jewish run population, Jewish-run media, a Jewish mayor, and domination of cultural and economic life. (1)
- that aint anti -zionism thats pure undiluted anti -semitism

Or how about his defence of terrorist groups like hamas. Apparently this is justified because these terrorist groups are anti-american. My reply to this is that, there is many ways of being anti american(which i dont support as im pro-american) which dont involve blowing yourself up. Also these extremist terrorist groups such as hezbollah deny the holocaust, say the jews committ blood libels, in the case of hezbollah, have al manar tv which has been banned in france due to it's anti semitic content, all whilst targeting innocent israeli civilians. Not exactly the group anyone from any side of the political spectrum you would of thought wanted to defend, yet good old Noam Chomsky has done so, apparently they should be allowed to have weapons, because there just so damn powerless without them. To quote Noam Chomsky on this argument that they should be in the hands of Hezbollah (the arms) as a deterrent to potential aggression, and there is plenty of background reasons for that.

It's nice to know the university seeks fit not to tell students about the real side to chomsky's character when talking about his tele-visual talk to the university, nope apparently he's a hero and a respected academic. Yep he is but only because no-one is allowed to challenge him , or has the guts to challenge him. Guess what he's not going to be debated on his talk either, giving it from soas a hotbed of far left activity he wont be challenged,and he cant be challenged by anyone on tele-visual where's he appearing at other univerisities cos guess what they can't ask him questions.But hang on i thought chomsky was meant to believe in freedom of speech obviously only when it suits him.

Good news from the latest opinion polls

The Latest Opinion Polls from Ipsos Mori, ICM and Political Betting are out and there extremely positive for the Conservative Party. We now according to the opinion polls, have a 17 point lead, the Conservative Party being around 44%, Labour 27% and the Liberal Democrats 18%.

Of course as I’m sure Eric Pickles will remind us all, this is not a time to stop with the good work done through canvassing and leafletting and other forms of campaigning. However it does show that up to now that the Conservative Party is being seen as a genuine credible alternative to the Labour party.

Anyway guys read the opinion polls it will put a smile on your face. Here is the link: http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/

Moving away from party political opinion polls, there was also a new poll on the general publics’ view on ID cards, which the Conservative party are implacably opposed to. The ICM poll found 38% thought that ID cards were a good idea with 62% being opposed to the idea. Public Opinion is changing on this and it seems here as with a lot of other areas the Conservative Party are winning the public argument.

Bob Crow couldn't care about the British Public

the head of the RMT union - the transport union is millitant left ex communist Bob Crow- they were even seen as too left wing by Ken Livingstone who called them a protection racket".

Yet Bob crow is proud of the fact that this year alone due to this ludicrous ballot system and incomprohensible demands is that by september there have been 100 strike actions( having strike ballots)-when there is not even a justification to strike.- yet he wears this as a badge of honour he is proud of the fact. He doesn't seem to care about the 1000s of commuters lives he is making a misery, the amount of taxpayers money he is costing, the effect it is having on a transport system -as long as he purues his politcal agenda it seems he couldn't care that he is wreaking havoc on the british economy. Crow has said it's a human right to strike -yes if you have a general grievance but not as is most of the time with you, for no reason, then you are impinging on the human rights of the vast majority of british citizens.

Bob Crow is just a sympton of some of the union leaders who feel now with the economic downturn there time has come from transport, to bins, to post -strikes are happening galore-strong government is needed to stand up to the union leaders. It is not about being anti union- it is about being anti union-leaders - who act undemocraticaly and are acting against the vast majority of union members they are supposedly representing.

A riposte to maryam ahmed and the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign walked out on an israeli Palestinian talks

Here's a message to those who walked out of an israeli-palestinian debate at the union-at the university of leeds. It's also a response to maryam ahmed who wrote to the student newspaper defending the actions of Palestinian Solidarity Campaign which i believe included herself.

1. The guy who defended israel was not israeli - are we now allowed to have people on
campus who defend the right of the state of israel- or do you call extreme allowing
israel's right to exist - and having a representative of the israeli government.

2. The palestine solidarity group -the speaker you wanted to bring in was a supporter
from hamas - you mention racism - yet Hamas is racist, sexist, anti semitic and
homophobic. They voice islamic extremism and last month kiled 50 palestinians for so
called collaboration with israelies. Do you support a hamas group -which says it wants to
throw all jews into the sea, who are sponsored by the leader of iran mahmoud ahmadenejad
who has denied the holocaust repeatedly. Are you really surprised then that the union
didn't support your choice - a guy who supports hamas -with all the problems that entails
-im not saying israel is always right-but im giving you the chance now loud and clear to
condemn hamas

3. You have used similar tactics before when lorna fitsimmons came to speak-she rightly
criticised islamic extremists -not muslims in general -but just the small minority of
extremists -yet you just ignored this and said she was islamaphobic -by virtue of this are
moderate muslims such as Ed Hussain, Shiraz Maher and stephen schwartz -islamaphobic and
self hating muslims

4. The panel was neutral -1 pro palestinian, 1 neutral, 1 pro israeli -what more do you
want. You criticise the israeli guy for defending israel-yet this was why he was bought -
let him do his job and then debate im -dont just walk out and act like a spoilt child

5. What happened in gaza wasn't a massacre-please may i remind you of the context a-
Israel for 4 years had had thousands of rockets fired at it - for no other reason then
they were israeli-the only reason the casualties were low was because the israeli
government unlike the palestinan government spent money on protecting it's citizens in
bomb shelters. If france constantly rocketed england - trying to kill as many civilians
as possible- would you expect the english government to do nothing. B-hamas hid in
civilian areas including in schools, hospitals and houses - they had people as young as
12 fighting for them , they fired from civilian areas and used civilians as human
shields, and dressed up in civilian clothes - it is therefore largely there fault for the
civilian deaths - they used civilians to protect themselves -and this led to deaths.
Still noone knows the exact number of dead but it was predicted around 800 of the 1200
deaths were hamas - yes the other 400 is to high but you have to put it in the context
that israeli army posted leaflets telling people to leave and phone calls before
strikes-hamas told them not to.

6. do you support the two state solution-like me - and yes i do think israel should get
out of the west bank - or do you just want israel not to exist whatsoever.

7. Do you recognise the jewish nature of the state of israel- just as im sure you would
recognise the muslim nature of saudi arabia.

8. You weren't prevented from taking part of the discussion -you walked out - what a
childish action. i cant help think you are insinuating that jack codd is biased through
doing this action hwich he isn't

9. are you taking the piss the palestinian voice is heard all the time from the un -to
the un palestinian refugees commission- yet my grandparents who were kicked out of iraq
because they were jewish and israel was created- along wth 750,000 others are ignored
-they dont have millions of pounds given to them, there plight is ignored, they dont have
international sympathy- or any redress from the crimes committed from arab governments.
It is the palestinian leadership which has failed the palestinian people- if in 2000 they
had accepted - barak's peace plan we would have never been in this mess -yet arafat chose
terrorism through the intifada.

10. It's not to do with racism or religion it's to do with land- a -yes israel should get
out of the west bank - b- recognition of a sovereign nation-ie israel which most arab
countries wont do or hamas - whilst that stays how can israel have peace with a group who
wants to kill them.

11. The comparison with south africa is rubbish -firstly israel has many black citizens
of its own, israel is not racist, yes they have made mistakes -but on the basis of trying
to defends its citizens - for example israeli arabs whilst by no means are there
conditions perfect-have the highest living standards in the arab world

12. What would a boycott actually achieve -you would make the israeli people more extreme
-and the groups you would be targeting like universities are the hub of the israeli peace
movement -way to have a non-joined up policy.

13. Some in your group shouted victory to the intifada -do you know how insulting this is
to jewish people -where hamas for example sat actively to kill as many people in israel
simply for being a jewish state.

- look forward to hearing a reply from you,

stephen hoffman

Cameron gave a speech worthy of a prime minister.

Cameron was straight with the british people today, unlike Mr Gordon Brown who lives in cloud cuckoo land.

He was honest saying there would have to be cuts and pain for the british people -but in the long run - it would be for the benefit of the british people - something gordon brown with his head buried in the sand won't acknowledge.

Cameron also gave a great speech ideologically - saying that unlike we conservatives oppose big government, because we believe in people power, and also we don't believe that everything can be solved by the state.

Finally he attack labour on the traditional labour territory-helping the poor they haven't done this and a conservative government will.

Look No Further than Boris Mayoralship of London to look at what a succesfull tory government will look like

Days after Boris was elected to mayor of London Ken Livingstones arrogantly had t-shirts which said "Dont Blame me i voted for ken"

Well Since that moment Boris has done a brilliant job as London Mayor. In unpopular times -he has made the tough decisions to depend the city of london which despite the credit crunch - conservatives believe and indeed i believe is still the motor of the british economy both in terms of wealth and taxation. In doing so he has stood up to the EU who have tried to tame the city of london so they get a competitive advantage-Cameron just like Boris will stand up to the EU -when they are working against British Interests. .In a time when supporting free trade and capitalism has been unpopular -Boris has stood up for free trade -which gives us innovation, competition, lower prices and more choice for the people.

Boris has like the conservatives will do made the tough choices on public Spending. After the glut of spending left by the irresponsible socialist spending policies of Ken Livingstone and his cronies -Boris had to cut spending and he has done fast. By doing this boris has proved the old lie wrong that cutting spending will cut services, or rising taxes. None of this has happened,in fact it just cuts bureaucracy which helps frontline services.Through winning this argument boris has provided a blueprint for the Conservative Cameron Government-if it gets to power to follow. According to Paul Waugh - Boris has cut the following:Cutting 1,000 admin jobs have gone at London Underground following the integration with Metronet, saving £570 million
* Cutting "several hundred" more posts elsewhere across TfL
* Saving £220 million from consultants bills
* £400 million from switching to more efficient computer systems
* £130 million from moving staff out of central London to cheaper premises in Southwark and North Greenwich.
* £185 million from re-negotiating the Oyster ticketing contract alone. A further £240 million from changes to contracts linked to the c-charge and low emission zone
* £200 million cut in marketing and press budget, redirected to fund extra police on Tubes and buses.
* Pay for senior staff has been frozen and bonuses cut, and the pay settlement for most staff will "reflect the economic realities being faced by millions of Londoners".

-not a bad list.

And in the words of Boris Johnson if i can make cuts in city hall, George Osbourne can make cuts in whitehall.

Under boris crime has reduced, transport is slowly improving, and spending has been put under control -the same is what the Conservatives will want to do if they get to power.

The conservatives are the party of reform.

To leading the way on the expenses scandal, to elected police chief, to elected mayors, and more power to local people, to decentralisation, to cutting the number of members of parliament and to reforming the public sector, to biting the bullet unlike the labour on welfare-the Conservatives under the leadership of David Cameron are the party of reform.

No more was this in evidence than George Young's speech saying how through reform parliament can onc3e again regain it's honour after the expenses debacle. Under a Conservative government no more will backbenchers will be ignored but they will get a real say- this will happen through backbenchers havingpower over what and when they debate, instead of the Executive having sole control over the whole Commons agenda.The Executive under labour has guillotined too many laws -and Cameron will readress this. Along with this the executive will no longer be able to guillotine bills -as for example they did on the Lisbon treaty. Then we can have real interesting and lively debate in the house of commons which the conservatives will be at the heart of

The regional select comittees who have been such a waste of money wil be abolished -they have achieved nothing and have just been a talking shop.

Select committees which have done a vital job in holding the government account will have more power -through having unwhipped elections. With more power - you will have a greater level of scrutiny of the government which is good for democracy.

The number of people in parliament for starters will be cut by 10% -to save us the British taxpayer money.

Not just this but for the first time in history the conservatives are considering giving people a real say in the legislation process. they are considering after a second reading of a bill -and before the select comittee stage- the public will get a say in laws which effects them. This is another example of the tories giving people real power.

To sum up the people want change from a tired, lieing, incompetent,unaccountable, unelected - in the cases of brown and mandelson, government - the conservatives through there packages of reforms offer this- Vote For Change -Vote for the conservative party.

biased bbc anyone?

1. For starters Andrew Marr interrupted David much more on average than Brown and Clegg

2. What has Cameron's wealth got to do with his ability to govern-Churchill had a lot of money , thatcher not so much -none of it made a difference so why the question-and again why when voters meet Margot James the tory candidate for stourbrdige go on about her wealth. It's about ability not how much your worth -someone should tell the BBC is. Also they dont seem to go on about wealthy labour mps

3. Fox hunting -with all the other issues around, ie welfare, afghanistan, the economy etc -why give a full feature to this on the politics show- it is not a matter of national importance.

Gordon Brown Decides to be part of a tv leaders debate

get your popcorn ready ladies and gentleman, get ready for a real good laugh because Gordon Brown that awesome debater is going to debate cameron and clegg. Tissues at the ready to wipe the tears of laughter.

This is a godsend for the tories, Gordon Brown will show himself to be the angry out of touch, out of control dictatorial style leader that he is.

Well actually to say gordon brown will be involved in an american style leader debate may be a bit strong -after all brown has said he will only accept a leadership debate on his own terms. So it could end up being a bit like the labour leadership debate there was meant to be - Gordon brown will try and bully anyone who dares challenge him and end up just debating his own reflection- even though would be great - the contradictions of the man will rise to the surface.